| Is Latour’s due process feasible? The case of housing management strategy implementation. |
|
Due to a change in regulations in the 1990s, Dutch housing associations have become much more independent from government policies. As a result they have to formulate their own strategic goals on how to deal with their properties. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether Bruno Latour's due process model can be of help to housing associations implementing their strategies. In his Political Ecology, Latour (2004) has presented the due process model as a model through which new plans or ideas can be realised in society. In the case of housing management, measures from the management strategy should be implemented. Following McMaster, Vidgen & Wastell (1998), I will apply the due process retrospectively. To this end, a case study was conducted at a Dutch housing association. In the next section, the due process model will be introduced. I will then explain the research method and the projects at Groenveld Wonen (fictitious name) that were selected for the case study. I will then progress to compare the due process model with the actual strategy implementation at the housing association before finally, drawing some conclusions from this comparison. The full paper has been published in: Fiona Hackney, Jonathan Glynne, & Viv Minton (eds.) (2009). Networks of Design. Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Conference of the Design History Society (UK). University College Falmouth, 3-6 September 2008.
Bekijk ook het Dossier Implementatie van Strategisch Voorraadbeleid.
|




